Talk:Site News
From Simpedia
19th July - Server Change! Finally!
We have finally found a reliable good server which can update at any time.
No, we haven't. The new server sucks... no .htaccess, no multi domains, no anything. --EdK (talk) (email) 07:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, but if we pay the $10 a month then we have. Who wishes to pay this? ¡иąтнąи!
| Talk 
| 
Email | 15:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- No, we haven't. No .htaccess even for the paid one. --EdK, who couldn't be bothered to sign in.
- As I have said many times, 110mb.com is the best free server available, and is probably better than a lot of the more basic paid ones... I suspect it would cost rather a lot to either run our own server or to pay for a better one, so for now I suggest we stick with the one we have and try and work round its annoying slowness. --Sam
| Talk 
| Email | 15:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- As I have said many times, 110mb.com is the best free server available, and is probably better than a lot of the more basic paid ones... I suspect it would cost rather a lot to either run our own server or to pay for a better one, so for now I suggest we stick with the one we have and try and work round its annoying slowness. --Sam
- No, we haven't. No .htaccess even for the paid one. --EdK, who couldn't be bothered to sign in.
Jd4Vn1 <a href="http://fpltjrgauuzv.com/">fpltjrgauuzv</a>, [url=http://afishovxotgw.com/]afishovxotgw[/url], [link=http://trmjxpphsxrk.com/]trmjxpphsxrk[/link], http://fmhrzjhonhgv.com/
[comment on this] Same problem, different text
Root Administrator is EdK.
As of 27 August, 2007, the Root Administrator can log into any account to perform operations such as email checking on suspect spam bots. Feature removed after testing and discussions over morality. --EdK (talk) (email) 09:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Supuhstar/sig
- I can't really do any more than I could before. It's still traceable and legally I have to inform the user. Which I will, if this feature is ever used. --EdK (talk) (email) 15:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unless this feature is removed and/or disabled immediately, I will be pressing charges against you, for the offence specified above. I have recieved intelligence that you did knowingly at 14:43 this afternoon edit the introduction to the Sysop Requests page whilst logged into my account, without my permission. I would appreciate it if this revision could be undone and removed from the database. Thanks, Sam "The Boss" | Talk | Email | 15:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
P.S. You can still make the edit, just do it from your account instead.
- Unless this feature is removed and/or disabled immediately, I will be pressing charges against you, for the offence specified above. I have recieved intelligence that you did knowingly at 14:43 this afternoon edit the introduction to the Sysop Requests page whilst logged into my account, without my permission. I would appreciate it if this revision could be undone and removed from the database. Thanks, Sam "The Boss"
- Incorrect. I logged into the database and changed the edit name from "EdK" to "Sam". I'll change it back now I've proved my point of this feature not allowing me any more privacy infringement than there ever was. --EdK (talk) (email) 20:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
